ITEM NO.29 Court 6 (Video Conferencing) SECTION II
S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No.3997/2021
(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 19-03-2021 in CRL.M.B.A. No.2313/2021 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad)
NEETU TRIPATHI Petitioner(s) VERSUS
STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & ANR. Respondent(s)
Date : 01-04-2022 This petition was called on for hearing today.
CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KISHAN KAUL
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M. SUNDRESH
For Petitioner(s) Ms. Manisha Bhandari, Adv.
Mr. Omkar Srivastava, Adv.
Mr. Shivam Pandey, Adv.
Mr. Dhruv Chandr, Adv.
Mr. Shashwat Sidhant, Adv.
Mr. Rameshwar Prasad Goyal, AOR
For Respondent(s) Mr. Vinod Diwakar, AAG
Mr. Garvesh Kabra, AOR
Mr. Amit Singh, Adv.
Mr. Divyesh Pratap Singh, AOR
Ms. Shivangi Singh, Adv.
Mr. Vikram Pratap Singh, Adv.
Ms. Ishita Bedi, Adv.
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following
O R D E R
We are informed by the complainant that there are four private witnesses. The grievance made is that whenever the first witness is under cross examination and after couple of questions the matter is deferred. If it is so, we cannot appreciate it. Once the witness is 1
in the witness box and is being cross examined every endeavour must be made to ensure that the cross examination is completed on that day. This is more so looking into the nature of the case before the Court which is not a complex criminal trial.
We expect the trial Court to complete the examination of the private witnesses before the next date.
List in the re-opening miscellaneous week in the month of July, 2022.
(RASHMI DHYANI) (POONAM VAID) COURT MASTER COURT MASTER
2
Comments