HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 6637/2019
Lakhpat Ola Son Of Shri Dolaram, Aged About 60 Years, Resident Of Choudhary Charan Singh Nagar, Navalgarh Road, Sikar (Rajasthan).
—-Petitioner
Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Chief Secretary, Government Of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat, Jaipur (Rajasthan).
2. Accountant General Of Rajasthan, Office Of Ag, Janpath, Jaipur (Rajasthan).
3. Additional Chief Secretary, Public Works Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat, Jaipur (Rajasthan).
4. District Collector, Sikar, Collectorate Sikar, (Rajasthan).
5. Chief Engineer And Additional Secretary (B And R), Public Works Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Jacob Road, Civil Lines, Jaipur (Rajasthan).
—-Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Saransh Saini
For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rajesh Maharshi, AAG through VC
HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. AKIL KURESHI HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL
Order
11/02/2022
In this public interest petition the petitioner has made allegation that certain officials of the Government have embezzled public funds by committing irregularities in public works contracts. The allegations include irregular payments in execution of the construction work of one Gaurav Path at Sikar during which
(Downloaded on 16/02/2022 at 06:39:51 PM)
(2 of 2) [CW-6637/2019]
according to the petitioner unauthorized over payments were made.
The state authorities appeared and filed reply dated
30.08.2019 dealing with each and every allegation of the petitioner and pointing out that the work as per the contract awarded or in some cases the extra work as needed was carried out and payments were made only after due verification and satisfaction of the authorities. Since two and half years of filing of the reply, the petitioner has not filed any rejoinder disputing any of the averments made in the reply.
Even otherwise we find the petition with long pleadings are
long in averments but short in contents. The allegations made in the petition would require supporting evidence. Even in a public interest petition the petitioner is not absolved of producing at least a basic proof of his allegations. When it comes to allegations of corruption in public life the Court would certainly view the allegations seriously and deal with them with caution. However without any supporting materials and particularly when the reply filed by the Government which covers and denies all averments of the petitioner and the reply has remained uncontroverted, we do not propose to carry this public interest petition any further.
The petition is dismissed.
(SUDESH BANSAL),J (AKIL KURESHI),CJ N.Gandhi/45
(Downloaded on 16/02/2022 at 06:39:51 PM)
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Comments