caselaws
Supreme Court of India
Kutubuddin Agarbattiwala vs Amina Bai &Amp; Ors on 29 May, 2017 1
ITEM NO.5 COURT NO.4 SECTION IV-A
S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
I.A.No.1&2 of 2017 IN Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C)
No.5386/2014
(Against the impugned final judgment & order dated 30.10.013 of the
High Court of Judicature for Madhya Pradesh, Bench at Indore in Civil
Writ Petition No.8537/2013)
KUTUBUDDIN AGARBATTIWALA & ORS. Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
AMINA BAI & ORS. Respondent(s)
(For directions and exemption from filing O.T.)
Date : 29/05/2017 This petition was called on for hearing today.
CORAM :
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. SIKRI
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA
[VACATION BENCH]
For Petitioner(s)
Mr.Zoheb Hossain, Adv.
For Respondent(s)
Mr.Shivam Sharma, Adv.
Mr.Mohan Pandey, Adv.
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following
O R D E R
Learned counsel for the respondents states that the
respondents are ready to return the cost/fees which was
Signature Not Verified
paid by the petitioner to the arbitrator appointed by
Digitally signed by
ASHOK RAJ SINGH
Date: 2017.05.31
10:18:35 IST
Reason:
this Court. He further submits that the respondents have
no objection if the new arbitrator, to be appointed by
this Court, continues in the proceedings from the stage
2
where the earlier arbitrator was. On this, learned
counsel for the petitioner does not have any objection if
some other arbitrator is appointed by this Court. With
the consent of the parties, Hon’ble Mr. Justice
D.M.Dharmadhikari, a former Judge of this court is
appointed as arbitrator. The petitioner shall also be
paid the cost of Rs.50,000/- (fifty thousand) by the
respondent.
With the above direction, I.A.No.1 of 2017 stands
disposed of.
Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of
accordingly.
(Ashok Raj Singh) (Mala Kumari Sharma)
Court Master Court Master
Comments